BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//132.216.98.100//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.20.4//
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:20251201T052249EST-3699LL3nBu@132.216.98.100
DTSTAMP:20251201T102249Z
DESCRIPTION:With Justice Patrick Healy (Court of Appeal of Quebec) Professo
 r Julian Roberts (University of Oxford) Dean Marie-Eve Sylvestre (Universi
 ty of Ottawa) moderated by Professor Marie Manikis (9IÖÆ×÷³§Ãâ·Ñ)\n\n
 Appellate review has been the principal mechanism of guidance in Canada fo
 r sentencing judges. Yet other models have been developed and implemented 
 in other jurisdictions. This panel considers two alternative models: the t
 raditional appellate review approach and guidance issued by an independent
  statutory authority – a Sentencing Commission. There will be three presen
 tations followed by general discussion. Justice Healy will explore the rol
 e of the appellate courts at sentencing in Canada\, with particular emphas
 is on the standard of review and the level of guidance. Professor Roberts 
 will then discuss the alternative approach which has been adopted in Engla
 nd and Wales and several other common law jurisdictions. The Sentencing Co
 uncil of England and Wales has issued offence-specific guidelines and guid
 elines addressing issues of relevance to all cases\, including sentence re
 ductions for a guilty plea. Dean Sylvestre will then explore the impact of
  both models on the sentencing of marginalized populations in Canada and t
 he ability of the judiciary to innovate\n
DTSTART:20230306T223000Z
DTEND:20230306T234500Z
LOCATION:9IÖÆ×÷³§Ãâ·Ñ Faculty of Law\, Maxwell Cohen Moot Court (NCDH 100)
SUMMARY:Annual Proulx Roundtable - Sentencing in Canada: Do Canadian courts
  have sufficient guidance?
URL:/law/channels/event/annual-proulx-roundtable-sente
 ncing-canada-do-canadian-courts-have-sufficient-guidance-345700
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR