BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//132.216.98.100//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.20.4//
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:20251216T091346EST-2586c1h8Lb@132.216.98.100
DTSTAMP:20251216T141346Z
DESCRIPTION:Atelier de théorie du droit avec notre invité Tarun Khaitan\, p
 rofesseur agrégé de droit à Oxford. Ses intérêts de recherche comprennent 
 le droit public\, le droit de la discrimination et la théorie du droit. Il
  a récemment publié une monographie intitulée 'A Theory of Discrimination 
 Law' (OUP). He parlera d'un article qu'il prépare sur les torts\, l'illicé
 ité et la culpabilité dans le droit de la discrimination indirecte.\n\nRés
 umé\n\n(En anglais seulement) In this paper\, we examine the nature of the
  duty-imposing norms in indirect discrimination (ID) law. We aim to clarif
 y two main issues. First\, we determine the extent to which these norms sh
 ould be understood as imposing particular duties – duties owed to particul
 ar individuals or as imposing general duties – duties owed to no one in pa
 rticular – or\, perhaps\, both. Let’s call this the duty inquiry. Second\,
  we clarify the extent to which considerations of culpability should be co
 nsidered to be aspects of the wrong(s) of discrimination. Let’s call this 
 the culpability inquiry. This paper is motivated by a recent trend in Brit
 ish and American law to doubt the legitimacy of the prohibition on ID and 
 to attempt to curtail its operation. We show through these inquiries that 
 the prohibition on ID is legitimate. To do so\, we carve a nuanced concept
 ual location for ID\, as necessitated in part by corrective justice and in
  part by distributive justice.\n\nThe first part of the paper provides a g
 eneral explanation of the concepts of particular and general duties. The s
 econd and third parts undertake the duty inquiry and culpability inquiry r
 espectively. We find that prima facie indirect discrimination usually enta
 ils the breach of two distinct duties\, making it wrong and wrongful. We a
 lso claim that while indirectly discriminatory acts can be wrongful though
  not otherwise culpable\, culpability considerations are nonetheless relev
 ant to supporting the liability regime for indirect discrimination. The fo
 urth part offers observations on the structure of discrimination law in li
 ght of our analysis.\n\nPour davantage d'informations\, contactez le profe
 sseur paul.miller [at] mcgill.ca (Paul Miller).\n
DTSTART:20161102T200000Z
DTEND:20161102T213000Z
LOCATION:Stephen Scott Seminar Room (OCDH 16)\, Chancellor Day Hall\, CA\, 
 QC\, Montreal\, H3A 1W9\, 3644 rue Peel
SUMMARY:Atelier de théorie du droit: Wrongs\, wrongfulness\, and culpabilit
 y in indirect discrimination law 
URL:/law/fr/channels/event/atelier-de-theorie-du-droit
 -wrongs-wrongfulness-and-culpability-indirect-discrimination-law-263263
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR